The Threshing Floor was my favorite chapter . It reminded me of my thoughts after I became a Freemason when I took the time to sit back and think about the degree(s) and take stock . I was going through some things in my life at the time that filled me with worry , but it was worry , that when I was given the proper tools showed me that they were not really important at all . I winnowed the good from the bad , and I am now the better for it , happier , calmer and more centered .
Cool, Ash ... but may I ask you to be more book-specific? What touched you in the
Threshing Floor? Which of the symbols provided spoke to you? Is the catechism sufficient to your needs/wants/thoughts? You know ... what about the book?
Now, I'm currently ruminating
The Flanked Circle (it seems that I don't have a favorite chapter, just every few days something comes up that reminds me of a section of this book, so I chew on it for a while until the next one pops up). The whole concept of the flanked circle is one that's dear to my heart - I spend a lot of time on it when I'm trainin' me up some EAs.
The section of this chapter headlined
Ministry (starting on page 59) comes the closest to what I think about the Flanked Circle, but does not go as far as I do when training. I spend a lot of time on the concept of ff&z, that which every apprentice should use when serving his Master. This, I find, is beautifully illustrated by the Work and by connecting the circle and ff&z, one can really make a thoughtful statement about the Craft. (You know, this is tough! How can I say this without revealing the work?) Anyhow, more on this subject as I find a way to communicate it safely. Besides, my experience and teaching have little to do with the book.
In
The Flanked Circle catechism (pages 55 to 68), there are two segments that I wonder about: The Mason-Dixon Line segment and the Dollar Sign segment (both in the Pillar Talk part of the Catechism). The M-D Line part flows right in, so it doesn't really disturb me as such, but the $ piece seems completely superfluous at best and may be out of place in the writing, or the dear author may find it to be chaff and winnow it away in future editions. (Sorry, Coach, I know you ask in the frontispiece for us to cast a non-critical eye on the work, but I just can't help myself.) Neither of these sections creates any light for me, although they are interesting historical touches.