Short answer: No, absolutely not.can a person wear masonic jewlrey when gettin his first degree
That is the case in Wisconsin, I found it when researching FM license plates...In some states it is actually illegal.
I've got to ask this question though. Who actually enforces this? What are the consequences, and how do they actually know for sure if you are a Master Mason or not? Just asking because I've never heard it was illegal, but rather just bad mojo.In some states it is actually illegal.
Singing: Old MacDonald had a farm ....I've got to ask this question though. Who actually enforces this?
We ... uh, THEY ... know. Don't think they don't.What are the consequences, and how do they actually know for sure if you are a Master Mason or not? Just asking because I've never heard it was illegal, but rather just bad mojo.
Don't worry my man, I'm a sleeper cell for the organization. Just finding out whose willing to "enforce" it.Singing: Old MacDonald had a farm ....
We ... uh, THEY ... know. Don't think they don't.
But we learn about the meanings of the S&C in the first degree. It's the position of the S&C the determines where we are in our travels. I agree that an EA should not wear a ring with the S&C in the position of a MM, but I think it's ok to wear it, if it's positioned correctly.Jewelry is not worn when actually receiving a degree. One is not entitled to wear the MM Square and Compasses until raised to the Sublime Degree of MM. it is inappropriate to wear MM jewelry when not raised to that level and knowing so but doing otherwise would speak volumes about ones virtue.
R. D. Meier PW Lansdowne Lodge #711
32nd Deg. Valley of Philadelphia
I've seen one or two. I've even seen rings where you cannot really tell what position the compasses are in - in relation to the square. My only thought is: "Why spend all that money on a piece of jewelry you're not going to be wearing for the rest of your life? Why not wait until you can wear the MM symbol and then spend your hard-earned money on that?"It has nothing to do with feelings, Brother. An EA wearing the mark of a MM is just plain wrong.
Good luck finding a ring with the S&C in the position of an EA. I've heard rumors that some make EA rings but have never seen one myself. I've seen plenty with them in the FC position, but not EA.
I agree fully brother but that is just mine and your views, this links in a little with the other thread discussing those who dont fully appreciate rituals/traditions etc. I was told by a PM of a lodge that I was being silly as what was on my ring was "just symbolism"! now figure that one out?! a freemason who doesn`t view symbolism as important? regarding rings with the FC position on, would these be old rings? many of our older lodges and old workings show the S&C in this position...It has nothing to do with feelings, Brother. An EA wearing the mark of a MM is just plain wrong.
Good luck finding a ring with the S&C in the position of an EA. I've heard rumors that some make EA rings but have never seen one myself. I've seen plenty with them in the FC position, but not EA.
Many are older, since the third degree was invented in the 18th century and previously a full Brother was a Fellow of the Craft.I agree fully brother but that is just mine and your views, this links in a little with the other thread discussing those who dont fully appreciate rituals/traditions etc. I was told by a PM of a lodge that I was being silly as what was on my ring was "just symbolism"! now figure that one out?! a freemason who doesn`t view symbolism as important? regarding rings with the FC position on, would these be old rings? many of our older lodges and old workings show the S&C in this position...