Custer148
Masonic Traveler
Dadgummit ....... I remember now what I forgot .......... that which was lost w........................find.Sorry, they've already found it Remember they made a movie about it.... LOL
Dadgummit ....... I remember now what I forgot .......... that which was lost w........................find.Sorry, they've already found it Remember they made a movie about it.... LOL
Dadgummit ....... I remember now what I forgot .......... that which was lost w........................find.
It turned out exactly like the first one. The hosts present "evidence" and (and i use this word only due to the fact that I can't think of one that describes them better) "experts" who say that the Freemasons erected the statue of liberty as an emblem of Satan for 90% of the episode. Then in the last 5 minutes when most people have stopped watching and now believe that the Masons did it, they talk with the only credible person in the show who sets them straight. He debunks not only the statue of liberty is a monument to satan aspects but even sets them straight as it comes to the definition of the word lucifer and its original meaning (which I learned from Bro. Hodapp's Freemasons for Dummies).I switched the TV off within 10 minutes of the third episode and went back to reading my book . How did it turn out , did the Masons do it ?
That is why I watched. And on that level it was useful. Although if any profane would have just watched the whole thing the show would have disproved itself in the last 5 minutes.I think we owe it to ourselves to watch programs like this....it is where some profane get their "info" on the Freemasons. Watching it doesnt mean we agree but we should know what the show is saying when a profane comes up and talks about it.....
Is he a member of the EIEI.....oops, I didn't say that.We now have someone on the staff @ the History Channel...... sure wish we had connections @ Golf Channel