He is just a purist and likes the old writing styles . He will eventually come around and read it because he can not go without reading anything and everything Masonic .I wonder what he is opposed to? Is it that he thinks the work is somehow changed?
Times change, and sometimes a different perspective on an older topic adds relevance to the overall message of the work. Take Sun Tsu's The Art of War for example. It's not only applied to warfare but business and other strategic planning as well. Had we not looked at it from a different view, it's applications may not have been fully realized. Jes sayin'
Resistance is futile..His curiosity will get the best of him...LOLHe is just a purist and likes the old writing styles . He will eventually come around and read it because he can not go without reading anything and everything Masonic .
Yes, that is an interesting book. My problem with it is the way he comes to conclusions: there's evidence of Templars in Scotland. Therefore - the Templars became Masons. There's a big piece of reasoning missing in the middle.I have just finished "Born in Blood: The Lost Secrets of Freemasonry" by John Robinson. Very interesting read and definitely made me think about the birth of the Craft.
Must of caught you out of seq. or your reply makes me go "Huh?"You mean the "then a miracle happens" part?
You mean the "then a miracle happens" part?Yes, that is an interesting book. My problem with it is the way he comes to conclusions: there's evidence of Templars in Scotland. Therefore - the Templars became Masons. There's a big piece of reasoning missing in the middle.
Small BF (Brain Fart).Must of caught you out of seq. or your reply makes me go "Huh?"