PatrickWilliams
I could tell you ...
Dang, I wish I could get that action rolling in Racine!Well said, Ashlar.
Here in WI we have many joint events and visit each other's Lodges on a regular basis. I feel fortunate to have done so.
Dang, I wish I could get that action rolling in Racine!Well said, Ashlar.
Here in WI we have many joint events and visit each other's Lodges on a regular basis. I feel fortunate to have done so.
The Grand Lodge of Masons in Massachusetts has F&AM as well as AF&AM Lodges. Ancient York, my Blue Lodge, is AF&AM while Philanthropic Lodge of Marblehead is F&AM. Both Lodges are under the jurisdiction of GLMM.Yes, there is a difference. Without going into the history of why, I can tell you that the reason has nothing to do with race whatsoever. Free and Accepted Masonry is the fraternity that I am a member of. Prince Hall Masonry is sometimes identified as Ancient Free and Accepted Masonry, however, there are some Ancient Free and Accepted fraternities that are not Prince Hall Masons. The word "Ancient" does not have anything to do with the age of these fraternities. Free and Accepted Masonry is the oldest fraternity, and Ancient Free and Accepted Masonry came about later. These two Fraternities do not have any ill will for one another, however, if you join one of them you can not join the other until you demit your membership.
Depending on the age and condition of a lodges original charter, a dispensation can be granted to use an approved and certified copy for the purpose of conducting business.I was under the impression that the Lodge's Charter is to be displayed in the Lodge for it to actually hold meetings.
Relax Brother,That is not true at all! In fact we are one of the only ones that can trace our charter back to the GLOE!!! This is what confuses people,please get your facts straight!!!!
The main reason for the confusion (espically in the south) is race plain and simple. Check your history!!!!
Indeed, you are right. It's pretty inevitable. And, once again, only the GL of KY knows what's best for Masons in KY.No one can guilt us into it , it will happen all in due time .
Whoa, whoa, whoa, Kevin! As far as I know, there is no jurisdiction (either Mainstream or Prince Hall) where a candidate can or will be rejected on the basis of his race. There may be individual Lodges within those jurisdictions that practice that sort of racism, but not entire jurisdictions. In fact, most jurisdictions have rules against that sort of thing, if I remember correctly. Yes, racism certainly still exists, even in the 21st Century, and probably will continue to exist for a very long time. The breach between Prince Hall and Mainstream is mainly political and has to do with the "doctrine of exclusive jurisdiction" than because of anything else.This kind of is a quandry for me as well. If it were up to me I'd would say that if a a gentlemen feels more comfortable in either a "Mainstream" or "Prince Hall" Lodge (regardless of skin color) then by all means he should be allowed to join that particular Lodge as long as he meets the criteria of belief in a Supreme being, is a "good man", and any other criteria that his jurisdiction requires. Unfortunately enough, racism STILL exists in the 21st Century! This saddens me greatly.
I guess I made myself unclear. I am not say that any jurisdiction is prhibiting anythong and I apologize if my words were taken as such. I was merely commenting that racism still exists witin our beautiful fraternity. If my words were misunderstood (I am not very good at expressing my words properly), then I take full responsibility for the misudnerstanding!Whoa, whoa, whoa, Kevin! As far as I know, there is no jurisdiction (either Mainstream or Prince Hall) where a candidate can or will be rejected on the basis of his race. There may be individual Lodges within those jurisdictions that practice that sort of racism, but not entire jurisdictions. In fact, most jurisdictions have rules against that sort of thing, if I remember correctly. Yes, racism certainly still exists, even in the 21st Century, and probably will continue to exist for a very long time. The breach between Prince Hall and Mainstream is mainly political and has to do with the "doctrine of exclusive jurisdiction" than because of anything else.